Teacher for Gifted Children as a Facilitator of Their Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2021-4(83)-53-55Keywords:
reflective mediators, consultants, instructors, learning experiences, knowledge, skillsAbstract
The article notes that in modern Ukrainian society the
concept of gifted children is of growing interest. The
author notes that a teacher is not only a subject for the
transfer of knowledge, but also, above all, a person who
loves his profession and students, to whom he must find
an individual approach, in order to show everyone's
abilities, or, conversely, developmental delays. In the
context of modern educational tasks, the problem of
teacher readiness to work with gifted children is becoming
increasingly important.The article states that the work of “teachers for gifted
children” and “ordinary” teachers is about the same.
Conditions for successful work with gifted children –
awareness of each teacher of the importance and necessity
of supporting this category of children; inclusion in the
work, first of all, of teachers who are able to present the
lesson material in an exciting way and to interest students;
creating conditions for the development of gifted
students; creating a system of presentation and recording
of student achievements.
The study was aimed to determine that teachers
should develop a learning environment that is relevant
to and reflective of their students' social, cultural, and
linguistic experiences. They act as guides, mediators,
consultants, instructors, and advocates for the students,
helping to effectively connect their culturally- and
community-based knowledge to the classroom learning
experiences. Teachers should use the students' home
cultural experiences as a foundation upon which to
develop knowledge and skills.
A teacher for a gifted child should be a person
who knows how to accept criticism, be resilient and
able to adequately respond to unusual situations. The
interaction of the teacher with the gifted student should
be aimed at the optimal development of abilities, have
the character of help, support, be non-directive. The
teacher must consider others capable of solving their
own problems, believe in their friendliness and that they
have positive intentions, have a sense of self-worth,
which should be valued, respected and protected. The
teacher must strive for intellectual self-improvement,
willing to work on replenishing their own knowledge,
be willing to learn from others, engage in self-education
and self-development.
Downloads
References
1. Wittmer, J. The Teacher As Facilitator Educational
Media Corp / J. Wittmer, R. D. Myrick. 1989. – September
1.– Р. 39–41.
2. Димухаметов Р. С. Настольная книга фасилита
тора: учеб.- метод. пособие организатора курсов по
вышения квалификации / Р. С. Димухаметов. – Челя
бинск, 2010. – 337 с.
3. Жижина И. В. Психологические особенности
развития фасилитации педагога : дис. … канд. псих.
наук / И. В. Жижина. – Екатеринбург, 2000. – 186 с.
4. Кондрашихіна О. О. Формування здатності до
фасилітаційних впливів у майбутніх практичних пси
хологів: автореф. дис. … канд. псих. наук / О. О. Кон
драшихіна. – Київ, 2004. – 20 с.
5. Павлютенков Є. М. Організація методичної ро
боти / Є. М. Павлютенков, В. В. Крижко. – Харків :
Основа, 2005. – 80 с.
References
1.Wittmer, J., & Myrick, R. D. (1989). The Teacher As
Facilitator Educational Media Corp. September 1. P. 39–
41. [in Russian].
2. Dimukhametov, R. S. (2010). Nastolnaya kniga
fasilitatora [Facilitator’s desk book]. Chelyabinsk. 337 p.
[in Russian].
3. Zhizhina, I. V. (2000). Psikhologicheskiye
osobennosti razvitiya fasilitatsii pedagoga [Psychological
features of development of facilitation of the teacher]:
Candidate’s thesis. Ekaterinburg. 186 p. [in Russian].
4. Kondrashikhіna, O. O. (2004). Formuvannya
zdatnostі do fasilіtatsіynikh vplivіv u maybutnіkh
praktichnikh psikhologіv [Formation of ability to facilitate
influences in future practical psychologists]: Extended
abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Pavlyutenkov, E. M., & Krizhko, V. V. (2005).
Organіzatsіya metodichnoi roboty [Organization of
methodical work]. Kharkiv. 80 p. [in Ukrainian].




