Experimental Testing of the Eff ectiveness of the Method of Implementing the Educational Model “Philosophical Dialogue” in General Secondary and Out-of-school Education Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63437/3083-6425-2025-3(98)-08Keywords:
scientific education, critical thinking, philosophical dialogue, philosophical exercises, experimentAbstract
The article presents the results and conclusions of the experiment on the implementation of promising models of specialized scientific education in general secondary and out-of-school education institutions within the framework of the experiment on the topic “Methodological foundations for the implementation of educational models of specialized scientific education in general secondary and out-of-school education institutions”, which was carried out in the Department of Designing the Development of Giftedness of the Institute of the Gifted Child of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (2023–2025). The focus of our research was the methodology of implementing the educational model of scientific education for children and youth “Philosophical Dialogue,” one of the authors and popularizers of which is G. Helskog.
The verification of its effectiveness took place during the experiment, which was organized in 4 stages: preparatory, ascertaining, formative, and control. All stages of the methodology were implemented on time and in full.
An important direction of work was the development of diagnostic methods for conducting the introductory and final survey. The participants of the online course, who took an active part in all forms of its work (lectures, practicals, independent work), significantly increased their awareness of the philosophical dialogue and formed the necessary skills.
The main form of the methodology was defined as an online course for the training of experimental teachers of GSEI and OSEI “Educational Model «Philosophical Dialogue as a Tool for the Development of Students’ Critical Thinking»”. For its implementation, a curriculum was developed, electronic educational and methodological content was prepared, which included lecture presentations, instructions for practical tasks for participants, a list of recommended literature, etc. Based on modern conditions, the online course was organized in a convenient format, which provided for holding classes and their recording for subsequent viewing.
An important feature of the methodology was that the participants of the course also directly conducted philosophical exercises in lessons, extracurricular and out-of-school activities in order to develop critical thinking of primary school students. They thoroughly developed a methodological map for conducting a philosophical exercise, analyzed the effectiveness of its implementation, made conclusions, and gave expert evaluation.
A positive result of the implementation of the experimental methodology was the development and approval of 2 club programs for primary school students with their further promising implementation in extracurricular and out-of-school activities.
Downloads
References
Використані літературні джерела
1. Камишин В. В., Ковальова О. А. Ефективність методики впровадження моделей наукової освіти: концепція оцінювання. Інноваційні практики наукової освіти: матеріали IV Всеукраїнської науково-практичної конференції (Київ, 11–16 груд. 2024 року). Київ, 2024. С. 360–364. Київ: Інститут обдарованої дитини НАПН України. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/743965/1/iv-vseukrayinska-naukovo-praktichna-konferenciya-innovaciyni-praktiki-naukovoyi-osviti_publications.pdf#page=360.
2. Ковальова О. А., Кочарян А. Б., Дубініна О. В., Бурлаєнко Т. І., Демченко О. П. Моделі наукової освіти для забезпечення відновлення та модернізації України: метод. посіб. Київ: Інститут обдарованої дитини НАПН України, 2024. 169 с. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63437/978-617-7734-57-3.
3. Helskog G. H. Philosophising the Dialogos Way toward Wisdom in Education. Between Critical Thinking and Spiritual Contemplation. London: Routledge Publishing Ltd., 2019. 272 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033985.
4. Helskog G. H. Philosophising towards Wisdom as nurturing the Tree of Life in us. HASER International journal of Philosophical Practice. 2021. No. 12. p. 149–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/HASER/2021.I12.05.
5. Гальченко М. С., Ільїн В. В., Скринник З. Е. Чого не знає ніхто, окрім філософів. Я розповім тобі...: навч. посіб. Київ: Ін-т обдар. дитини НАПН України, 2024. 299 с.
6. Кремень В. Г., Гальченко М. С., Ільїн В. В. Філософія як засіб розвитку дитини: обдарованість, знання, творчість: навч. посіб. Київ: Інститут обдарованої дитини НАПН України, 2023. 110 с.
7. Ковальова О., Казакова О. Модель допитливого навчання Вінн Гарлен у контексті подолання освітніх втрат. Педагогічні інновації: ідеї, реалії, перспективи. 2023. 2 (31). С. 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2023-2(31)-55-63.
8. Ковальова О. Становлення поняття «наукова грамотність» у термінологічному полі наукової освіти в англомовному науковому дискурсі. Освіта та розвиток обдарованої особистості. 2021. № 2 (81). С. 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2021-2(81)-18-24.
REFERENCES
1. Kamyshyn, V. V., & Kovalova, O. A. (2024). Efektyvnist metodyky vprovadzhennia modelei naukovoi osvity: kontseptsiia otsiniuvannia [The effectiveness of the methodology for implementing models of science education: The concept of assessment]. Innovatsiini praktyky naukovoi osvity – Innovative practices of science education: Proceedings of the IV All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference (Kyiv, December 11–16, 2024) P. 360–364. Kyiv: Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny NAPN Ukrainy. Retrieved from: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/743965/1/iv-vseukrayinska-naukovo-praktichna-konferenciya-innovaciyni-praktiki-naukovoyi-osviti_publications.pdf#page=360. [in Ukrainian].
2. Kovalova, O. A., Kocharian, A. B., Dubinina, O. V., Burlaienko, T. I., & Demchenko, O. P. (2024). Modeli naukovoi osvity dlia zabezpechennia vidnovlennia ta modernizatsii Ukrainy: metod. posib. [Models of science education for ensuring the recovery and modernization of Ukraine: A methodological guide]. Kyiv. 169 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63437/978-617-7734-57-3. [in Ukrainian]
3. Helskog, G. H. (2019). Philosophising the Dialogos way toward wisdom in education: Between critical thinking and spiritual contemplation. London: Routledge Publishing Ltd. 272 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033985.
4. Helskog, G. H. (2021). Philosophising towards wisdom as nurturing the tree of life in us. HASER – International Journal of Philosophical Practice, 12, 149-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/HASER/2021.I12.05.
5. Halchenko, M. S., Iljin, V. V., & Skrynnyk, Z. E. (2024). Choho ne znaie nikhto, okrim filosofiv. Ya rozpovim tobi…: navch. posib. [What no one knows except philosophers. I will tell you…: A textbook]. Kyiv. 299 р. [in Ukrainian].
6. Kremen, V. H., Halchenko, M. S., & Iljin, V. V. (2023). Filosofiia yak zasib rozvytku dytyny: obdarovanist, znannia, tvorchist [Philosophy as a means of child development: Giftedness, knowledge, creativity]. Kyiv. 110 р. [in Ukrainian].
7. Kovalova, O., & Kazakova, O. (2023). Model dopytlyvoho navchannia Vynn Harlen u konteksti podolannia osvitnikh vtrat [The model of inquiry-based learning by Wynne Harlen in the context of overcoming educational losses]. Pedahohichni innovatsii: idei, realii, perspektyvy – Pedagogical innovations: Ideas, realities, perspectives, 2(31), 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2023-2(31)-55-63. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kovalova, O. (2021). Stanovlennia poniattia “naukova hramotnist” u terminolohichnomu poli naukovoi osvity v anhlomovnomu naukovomu dyskursi [The formation of the concept “scientific literacy” in the terminological field of science education in the English-language academic discourse]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of gifted personality, 2(81), 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2021-2(81)-18-24. [in Ukrainian].
