The Concept of Scientific Thinking in Gifted Students: Characteristics, Features and Structural Components

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63437/3083-6425-2025-3(98)-01

Keywords:

divergent thinking, integrative thinking, convergent thinking, critical thinking, logical reasoning, scientific thinking, gifted students, educational environment, pedagogical support, reflexivity

Abstract

This article examines the essence of scientific thinking in gifted students, highlighting its defining characteristics, structural components, and specific features that distinguish this form of intellectual development. In gifted learners, scientific thinking encompasses logical, critical, divergent, and convergent thinking. It is directed not only toward the discovery, assimilation, and application of new knowledge but also toward solving complex problems through analysis, synthesis, interpretation, and evaluation of information.

This type of thinking includes several key aspects:

– logical reasoning, which enables structured and well-grounded argumentation based on the principles of formal logic;

– critical thinking, which allows students to question information, evaluate its credibility, and assess its relevance;

– divergent thinking, which promotes the generation of multiple original ideas in response to open-ended, problem-based questions;

– convergent thinking, which supports the identification of optimal solutions through logical analysis, generalization, and systemic reasoning;

– reflexivity, defined as the ability to reflect on one’s own cognitive processes and adjust decision-making strategies accordingly;

– integrative thinking, which facilitates the synthesis of knowledge from different domains to construct a holistic understanding of phenomena and processes.

For gifted students, scientific thinking requires not only a high level of proficiency in cognitive tools, but also intellectual flexibility, reflexive awareness, and the ability to mobilize interdisciplinary knowledge in novel and complex cognitive contexts. The development of scientific thinking in this group involves the creation of a dedicated educational environment that stimulates exploratory activity, supports initiative, fosters experimentation, and nurtures sustained motivation for learning.

This study emphasizes the importance of integrating diverse cognitive approaches–including divergent, convergent, logical, critical, reflexive, and interdisciplinary thinking–to ensure the comprehensive cognitive development of gifted students. Moreover, it underlines the vital role of pedagogical support in cultivating these intellectual strategies and stresses the necessity of educational practices that foster intellectual curiosity, problem-solving abilities, and innovative thinking. By developing scientific thinking, educators can help gifted students realize their full potential, thereby contributing to both individual intellectual growth and broader societal advancement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Використані літературні джерела

1. Бібік Н. М. Дидактика в системі педагогічних наук. Київ: Пед. думка, 2004. 256 с.

2. Вейцман М. Б. Cognitive Development in Adolescence and Its Impact on Scientific Thinking. Educational Psychology Review. 2018. Vol. 30, No. 3. P. 425–442.

3. Волощук І. С., Киричук В. О., Мадзігон В. М., Мелешко В. В., Рудик Я. М., Шуленок О. С., Яременко Л. А. Дидактичні засади креативного розвитку інтелектуально обдарованих учнів ліцеїв. Київ: Ін-т обдаров. дитини НАПН України, 2021. 160 с.

4. Гончаренко С. У. Формування у дорослих сучасної наукової картини світу: монографія. Київ: ІПООД НАПН України, 2013. 220 с.

5. Грета А. Т. Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills Development: An International Perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2019. Vol. 111, No. 4. P. 625–638.

6. Громко І. В. Формування дослідницьких умінь в умовах модернізації освіти. Інновац. педагогіка. 2015. № 2. С. 118–122.

7. Кам’янська Л. В. Методологічні основи розвитку критичного мислення учнів: вітчизняний та міжнародний досвід. Наук. перспективи. 2021. № 5. С. 78–85.

8. Ковальова О. А., Міленіна М. М., Дубініна О. В., Бурлаєнко Т. І., Ісаченко О. М. Теорія та практика наукової освіти Малої академії наук України. Київ: Ін-т обдаров. дитини НАПН України, 2022. 288 с.

9. Колесник М. О. Інтердисциплінарний підхід у формуванні наукового мислення учнів. Пед. інновації в Україні. 2020. № 1. С. 50–55.

10. Кулагіна І. Ю. Інноваційні підходи до формування наукового мислення учнів. Теорія і практика упр. освітою. 2018. № 1. С. 82–86.

11. Піддячий В. М. Розвиток гнучких навичок фахівців в умовах змін ринку праці. Молодь і ринок. 2022. № 7(205). С. 77–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4634.2022.266017.

12. Піддячий М. І. Соціально-професійний розвиток особистості. Наук. часопис НПУ імені М. П. Драгоманова. Сер. № 5. Пед. науки: реалії та перспективи. 2019. № 15. С. 448–452. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/717254/.

13. Stones E. Psychopedagogy: psychological theory and the practice of teaching. London: Methuen, 1979. 256 p.

References

1. Bibik, N. M. (2004). Dydaktyka v systemi pedahohichnykh nauk [Didactics in the system of pedagogical sciences]. Kyiv. 256 р. [in Ukrainian].

2. Weitzman, M. B. (2018). Cognitive development in adolescence and its impact on scientific thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 425-442.

3. Voloshchuk, I. S., Kyrychuk, V. O., Madzihon, V. M., Meleshko, V. V., Rudyk, Ya. M., Shulenok, O. S., & Yaremenko, L. A. (2021). Dydaktychni zasady kreatyvnoho rozvytku intelektualno obdarovanykh uchniv litseiv [Didactic principles of creative development of intellectually gifted lyceum students]. Kyiv. 160 p. [in Ukrainian].

4. Honcharenko, S. U. (2013). Formuvannia u doroslykh suchasnoi naukovoi kartyny svitu [Formation of a modern scientific worldview in adults]. Kyiv. 220 p. [in Ukrainian].

5. Hreta, A. T. (2019). Critical thinking and problem-solving skills development: An international perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 625-638.

6. Hromko, I. V. (2015). Formuvannia doslidnytskykh umin v umovakh modernizatsii osvity [Formation of research skills in the context of education modernization]. Innovatsijna pedahohika – Innovative Pedagogy, (2), 118-122. [in Ukrainian].

7. Kam’ianska, L. V. (2021). Metodolohichni osnovy rozvytku krytychnoho myslennia uchniv: vitchyznianyi ta mizhnarodnyi dosvid [Methodological foundations of developing students’ critical thinking: National and international experience]. Naukovi perspektyvy – Scientific Perspectives, (5), 78-85. [in Ukrainian].

8. Kovalova, O. A., Milenina, M. M., Dubinina, O. V., Burlaienko, T. I., & Isachenko, O. M. (2022). Teoriia ta praktyka naukovoi osvity Maloi akademii nauk Ukrainy [Theory and practice of scientific education of the Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. Kyiv. 288 p. [in Ukrainian].

9. Kolesnyk, M. O. (2020). Interdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid u formuvanni naukovoho myslennia uchniv [Interdisciplinary approach in the formation of students’ scientific thinking]. Pedahohichni innovatsii v Ukraini – Pedagogical Innovations in Ukraine, (1), 50-55. [in Ukrainian].

10. Kulahina, I. Yu. (2018). Innovatsiini pidkhody do formuvannia naukovoho myslennia uchniv [Innovative approaches to the formation of students’ scientific thinking]. Teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia osvitoiu – Theory and Practice of Education Management, (1), 82-86. [in Ukrainian].

11. Piddiachyi, V. M. (2022). Rozvytok hnuchkykh navychok fakhivtsiv v umovakh zmin rynku pratsi [Development of soft skills of specialists in the conditions of labor market changes]. Molod i rynok – Youth and the Market, 7(205), 77-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4634.2022.266017 [in Ukrainian].

12. Piddiachyi, M. I. (2019). Sotsialno-profesiinyi rozvytok osobystosti [Socio-professional development of personality]. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia № 5. Pedahohichni nauky: realii ta perspektyvy – Scientific Journal of NPU named after M. P. Drahomanov. Series No. 5. Pedagogical Sciences: Realities and Prospects, (15), 448-452. Retrieved from: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/717254/ [in Ukrainian].

13. Stones, E. (1979). Psychopedagogy: Psychological theory and the practice of teaching. London, 256 p.

Published

2025-10-01