Communicative Approach to Teaching Students of Secondary Specialized Education of a Scientifc Direction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2022-3(86)-28-36Keywords:
communication, speech activity, research competence, language of science, scientifc lyceum, training, developmentAbstract
The content of the article includes the result of the search and analytical activity of the author regarding the implementation of new achievements in psycholinguistics and linguistic-pedagogical psychology in the educational process of scientifc lyceums and scientifc boarding lyceums. The article, based on the data of psycholinguistics, reveals such concepts as: “speech activity”; “speech practice”; “communicative and speech activity” taking into account its components (“auditory activity”, “discursive activity”); “scientifc communication”; “scientifc discourse” and others. The role of communication in the implementation of the content of specialized scientifc education is substantiated; the specifcs of the introduction of scientifc communication in the process of formation the research activity, research competence and research culture among lyceum students are revealed; the ways of forming scientifc and communicative skills in them are presented, taking into account the structure of communication acts, in particular the skills: to quickly and correctly navigate in the conditions of speech communication, to plan one’s speech, choose the content of the statement, fnd adequate language means to convey it to the communicators, and provide feedback to them. Considerable attention in the content of the article is devoted to highlighting the importance of the language of science for the successful implementation of scientifc communication; peculiarities of mastering by the acquirers of specialized education of the scientifc direction by its various means, the place of the means of scientifc language in the generative speech process. On specifc linguistic and pedagogical examples, it is demonstrated how the teacher should act in the educational process in order to form scientifc communicative and speech competence in students; it has been proven that learning in scientifc lyceums should be done in the form of communication. It is for this purpose has been proposed a communicative approach which contributes to the realization of the tasks of education provided by the Standard of specialized education of a scientifc direction, and correlates with other approaches: activity-based, personality-oriented, and competence-based
Downloads
References
1. Danchenko, H. V. (2002). Psykholohichni determinanty rozvytku komunikatyvnoi kompetentnosti menedzhera osvity shkilnoho rivnia [Psychological determinants of the development of communicative competence of a schoollevel education manager]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis.. Kyiv 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
2. Zhinkin, N. I. (1966). Psihologicheskie osnovy razvitiya rechi [Psychological foundations of speech development]. V zashhitu zhivogo slova – In defense of the living word. Moscow. P. 5–25. [in Russian].
3. Ivanchuk I. A. (2005). Ritoricheskij komponent v publichnom diskurse nositelej jelitarnoj rechevoj kulturi [Rhetorical component in the public discourse of elite speech culture carriers]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis.. Saratov. 65 p. [in Russian].
4. Kalmykova, L. O., & Volzhentseva, I. V. (Ed.) (2020). Movlennieva diialnist yak odyn iz vyiaviv bahatovymirnoho movlennievoho fenomena [Speech activity as one of the manifestations of the multidimensional speech phenomenon]. Psychological safety of the individual. (International collective monograph). Pereiaslav. P. 237–261. [in Ukrainian].
5. Kalmykova, L., Kharchenko, N., & Mysan, I. (2021). Na shcho spromozhna heneratyvna systema liudyny? [What is the human generative system capable of?] Psycholinguistics in the modern world, 16, P. 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/10.31470/2706- 7904- 2021- 16-113- 127 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kalmykova, L., Kharchenko, N., & Mysan, I. (2021). Tradytsiini ta innovatsiini pidkhody do funktsionalnoi klasyfkatsii etnichnykh mov svitu: problemy movnoi osobystosti – subiekta komunikatyvno- movlennievoi diialnosti [Traditional and innovative approaches to the functional classifcation of ethnic languages of the world: problems of the language personality - the subject of communicative and speech activity]. Lingua Montenegrina, XIV/2(28), P. 65–81. [in Ukrainian].
7. Kalmykova, L., Kharchenko, N., & Mysan, I. (2021). «YA- mova» i.e. «Individualna mova»: problema funkcionalnoyi generalizaciyi [«I- language» i. e. «Individual language» : The Problem of Functional Generalization]. Psycholinguistics, 29 (1), P. 59–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309- 1797- 2021- 29- 1- 59- 99. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kalmykova, L. O. (2022). Osoblyvosti komunikatsii yak resursu zabezpechennia realizatsii zmistu serednoi spetsializovanoi osvity naukovoho spriamuvannia [Peculiarities of communication as a resource for ensuring the implementation of the content of secondary specialized education in a scientific direction]. Pedahohichni innovatsii: idei, realii, perspektyvy – Pedagogical innovations: ideas, realities, perspectives. 1 (28), P. 86–97. DOI https://doi. org/10.32405/2413- 4139- 2020- 1(28)- 86- 97. [in Ukrainian].
9. Kahno, I. V. (2013). Movlennieva kultura yak skladova profesiinoi pidhotovky maibutnoho likaria terapevta [Speech culture as a component of the professional training of the future therapist]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].
10. Klobukova, L. P. (1987). Obuchenie yazyku specialnosti. [Teaching the language of the specialty]. Moscow, 81 p. [in Russian].
11. Korniyaka, O. M. (2018). Komunikatyvni chynnyky profesiinoho samozdiisnennia vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly [Communicative factors of the professional self- realization of a higher school teacher]. Psykholinhvistyka. Psykholynhvystyka. Pssycholinguistics – Psykholinhvistyka. Psykholynhvystyka. Pssycholinguistics. 23 (1), P. 139–159. [in Ukrainian].
12. Kochetkova, T. V. (1999). Yazykovaya lichnost nositelya jelitarnoj rechevoj kultury [Language personality of the bearer of the elite speech culture]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. 53 p. [in Russian].
13. Krapotina, T. G. (2014). Razvitie i sovereshenstvovanie yazykovoj lichnosti uchitelya v novyh sociokulturnyh usloviyah [Development and improvement of the language personality of the teacher in the new socio- cultural conditions]. Professionalizm pedagoga: sushhnost, soderzhanie, perspektivy razvitiya – Teacher’s professionalism: essence, content, development prospects]. Moscow; Yaroslavl. 712 p. [in Russian].
14. Leontiev, A. A. (1974). Psiholingvisticheskie problemy massovoj komunikacii [Psycholinguistic problems of mass communication]. Moscow. 148 p. [in Russian].
15. Leontiev, A. A. (1997). Psihologiya obshheniya [Psychology of communication]. Moscow. 365 p. [in Russian]. 16.
17. Luria, A. R. (2002). Osnovy nejropsihologii. [Fundamentals of neuropsychology]. Moscow. 384 p. [in Russian].
18. Lvov, M. R. (2002). Osnovy teoryy rechy Moscow. 248 p. [in Russian].
19. Pro zatverdzhennia Standartu spetsializovanoi osvity naukovoho spriamuvannia zatverdzhenoho postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 16. 10. 2019 r. protokol № 1303. [On the approval of the Standard for specialized education in the scientifc direction approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine resolution from October 16, 2019. Protocol No. 1303]. [in Ukrainian].
20. Popovitskaya, N. V. (2014). Profesionalnye trebovaniya k golosu pedagoga kak predstavitelyu rechegolosovyh profesij [Professional requirements for the teacher’s voice as a representative of speechvoice professions]. Profesionalizm pedagoga: sushhnost, soderzhanie, perspektivy razvitiya – Professionalism of a teacher: essence, content, development prospects Moscow. P. 571–575. [in Russian].
21. Rumyantseva, I. M. (2004). Psihologiya rechi i lingvopedagogicheskaya psihologiya [Psychology of speech and linguo-pedagogical psychology]. Moscow. 316 p. [in Russian].
22. Shakhnarovich, A. M. (1987). Problemy psiholingvistiki. [Problems of Psycholinguistics]. Moscow. 268 p. [in Russian].
