Correlation of Mothers with Different Ideas About the Social Roles of Women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2021-1(80)-51-54Keywords:
ideas, psychological factor, social role, teenage children, child-parental relations, maternal attitudeAbstract
The article considers the problem of child-parental relations in the context of the individual psychology of mothers.
Empirical evidence reveals the role of mothers’ perceptions of women’s social roles in determining their attitudes towards
children. According to the data obtained, the relationship between the prevailing styles of child-parental relations and the
ideas of mothers about a woman in the role of a “housewife” and a “socially active person” is proved.
Controlling human behavior in interpersonal interaction is a psychological process with most complex internal
mechanism. The quality of this control depends on many social and individual psychological factors. Undoubtedly, the style
of behavior that people choose to interact largely depends on the social and natural conditions in which it unfolds. At the
same time, it must be recognized that values, ideals, communicative abilities, and psychological problems of the person
play an important role in this choice. One of these most important subjective factors that determine the characteristics of
interpersonal interaction is the requirements of social roles, being the owners of which people enter into interaction. Indeed,
it is often the demands of a social role that acts as a regulator that induces one action and stops others.
In child-parental relations as a special type of human-human relationship, the factor of social roles is also important.
The results of a number of psychological studies suggest that even at the level of ideas about social roles, the meanings of
this factor in the relationship between parents and children can be traced, which is also shown by the results of our studies.
Downloads
References
Використані літературні джерела
1. Белогай К.Н. Структурные компоненты
родительского отношения личности: автореф. дис. …
к. психол. н. Кемерево : КГУ, 2006. 24 с.
2. Гериг Р., Зимбардо Ф. Психология и жизнь. 16-е
изд. СПб. : Питер, 2004. 955 с.
3. Грицкевич Т.И. Реформатор: социальная роль
или особенности личностных черт. Вестник ВГУ.
2009. № 2. С. 140–148.
4. Клочко Ю.Н., Ермилова Н.Ю., Клочко А.Ю.
Социализация личности, ее социальный статус и
социальная роль. Вестник СевКавГТУ. 2004. № 1 (11).
С. 45–53.
5. Овчарова Р.В. Психология родительства:
учеб. пособие для студ. высш. учеб. заведений. М. :
Академия, 2005. 368 с.
6. Овчарова Р.В. Родительство как психологический
феномен: учеб. пособие. М. : Москов. психол.-социал.
ин-т, 2006. 496 с.
7. Почебут Л.Г. Личность в группе. Психология:
учебник / отв. ред. А.А. Крылов. 2-е изд., перераб. и
доп. М. : Проспект, 2004. С. 381–398.
8. Станкин М.И. Социальная роль. Специалист.
2004. № 2. С. 25–29.
9. Абдуллаева Д.У. Детско-родительские
отношения как фактор развития креативности детей.
Развитие интеллектуально-творческого потенциала
молодежи: из прошлого в современность: материалы
Междунар. очно-заочной науч.-практ. конф. 2018.
С. 335–336.
10. Абдуллаева Д.У. К вопросу об этнических
особенностях взаимоотношений ребёнка с матерью
отношения (на основе историко-этнологических
материалах узбекского этноса). Вестник
интегративной психологии. 2018. № 17. С. 23–26.
11. Abdullaeva D.U. The woman’s imagination as a
mother about herself and the related features of her child
attitude to her. Modern views and research: Materials
of the international scientific and practical conference.
London, 2020. P. 59–63.
References
1. Belogaj, K.N. (2006). Strukturnye komponenty
roditel’skogo otnoshenija lichnosti [Structural
components of the parental relationship of personality].
Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kemerevo. 24 p.
2. Gerig R., & Zimbardo F. (2004). Psihologija i zhizn’
[Psychology and life]. 16th ed. St. Peterburg, 955 p.
3. Grickevich, T.I. (2009). Reformator: social’naja
rol’ ili osobennosti lichnostnyh chert. [Reformer: social
role or features of personal traits]. Vestnik VGU – Bulletin
of the Higher State University. 2. P. 140–148.
4. Klochko, Ju.N., Ermilova, N.Ju., Klochko, &
A.Ju. 2004. Socializacija lichnosti, ee social’nyj status
i social’naja rol’ [Socialization of personality, its social
status and social role]. Vestnik SevKavGTU – Bulletin of
SevKavSTU. 1 (11). P. 45–53.
5. Ovcharova, R.V. (2005). Psihologija roditel’stva
[Psychology of Parenthood]. Moscow: Academy, 368 p.
6. Ovcharova, R.V. (2006). Roditel’stvo kak
psihologicheskij fenomen [Parenthood as a psychological
phenomenon]. Moscow. 496 p.
7. Pochebut, L.G. (2004). Lichnost’ v gruppe.
Psihologija [Psychology]. Moscow. P. 381–398.
8. Stankin, M.I. (2004). Social’naja rol’ [Social role].
Specialist – Expert. 2. P. 25–29.
9. Abdullaeva, D.U. (2018). Detsko-roditel’skie
otnoshenija kak faktor razvitija kreativnosti detej [Childparental relations as a factor in the development of
children’s creativity]. Razvitie intellektual’no-tvorcheskogo
potenciala molodezhi: iz proshlogo v sovremennost’ –
Development of the intellectual and creative potential
of youth: from the past to the present. Materials of the
international scientific and practical conference P. 335–336.
10. Abdullaeva, D.U. (2018). K voprosu ob
jetnicheskih osobennostjah vzaimootnoshenij rebjonka s
mater’ju otnoshenija (na osnove istoriko-jetnologicheskih
materialah uzbekskogo jetnosa) [On the issue of the
ethnic features of the relationship between the child
and the mother of the relationship (based on historical
and ethnological materials of the Uzbek ethnic group)].
Vestnik integrativnoj psihologii – Bulletin of integrative
psychology. 17. P. 23–26.
11. Abdullaeva, D.U. (2020). The woman’s
imagination as a mother about herself and the related
features of her child attitude to her. Modern views and
research: Materials of the international scientific and
practical conference. London. P. 59–63.
