Giftedness: from the peaple ways to the science principles of identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2023-2(89)-5-15Keywords:
identification of giftedness, empirical spontaneous identification of giftedness, scientific identification of giftedness, means of identification of giftedness, empirical formulas of identification of giftedness, empirical, typologically – differential schemes of identification of giftedness, principles of identification of giftednessAbstract
The content of the article represents an attempt to analyze the possibility of extracting from the common implicit and expressed ways of recognizing giftedness, which have developed and are used spontaneously in empirical social practice, the principles of scientifically proven and substantiated identification. A positive assumption about the realism of such a possibility is based on the idea of interaction between the empirical natural and scientific spheres of giftedness identification. This interaction is carried out, according to the author, thanks to the work of the mechanism of mutual infiltration of content, the effect of which is that the means of detection and evaluation of giftedness, which are used in the field of scientific identification, are developed on the basis of empirical information that was infiltrated from the field of non scientific spontaneous identification, and those methods used in this field have undergone and are undergoing changes under the influence of content infiltration from the field of scientific identification. The extraction of information about methods of recognizing giftedness from the field of non scientific experience is considered as a method of scientific research, the purpose of which is to verify the potential of their reliability and study the possibility of using them as scientifically based indicators of giftedness. The article contains a list of tools that are spontaneously used in the empirical practice of giftedness recognition and the extraction of which is important for their scientific analysis and processing. The list of these tools includes: empirical ideas and concepts; scientific concepts and definitions that have infiltrated the field of empirical identification of giftedness; empirical formulas for identification of giftedness; empirical, typologically – differential schemes for identification of giftedness; empirical criteria and indicators for identification of giftedness; empirical implicit or conscious images of the limits of giftedness; empirical implicit principles of identification of giftedness; empirical methods of identifying giftedness; popularized diagnostic techniques for identifying giftedness. Among the indicators of giftedness, which have a significant scientific potential, and with respect to which an act of extraction can be carried out based on a critical examination of part of the processes of spontaneous identification of giftedness, are the principles of its identification. The principles of identification of giftedness are interpreted as general theoretical and methodological guidelines, the observance of which ensures the possibility of achieving the effect of reliable identification of giftedness. Their systematic application, i.e. application according to the full list and in the set of associative connections between them, is the basis for developing means of systemic, and therefore relevant to the nature of giftedness, its identification.
Downloads
References
1. Anishchenko, N., & Kovalov, O. (2022). Rol innovatsiinoho osvitnoho prostoru v protsesi konstytuiuvannia kreatyvnoi spilnoty doslidnykiv (na prykladi mizhnarodnoi prohramy «Filosofiia dlia ditei») [The role of innovative educational space in the process of constituting a creative community of researchers (on the example of the international program «Philosophy for Children»)]. Pedahohichni innovatsii: idei, realii, perspektyvy – Pedagogical innovations: ideas, realities, perspectives. 1 (28). 43–53. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bielska, N. A., & Melnyk, M. Y. (2022). Doslidzhennia rezylientnosti uchasnykiv osvitnoho protsesu v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Study of the resilience of participants in the educational process in the conditions of war].Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of a gifted personality. 2 (85). 98–107. [in Ukrainian].
3. Bielska, N. A. (2022). Doslidzhennia diahnostychnykh mozhlyvostei testovoi metodyky Dzh. Oldkhema – L. Morisa «Personalnyi avtoportret» dlia identyfikatsii litseistiv z oznakamy obdarovanosti (chastyna 2) [Study of the diagnostic capabilities of the J. Oldham-L. Morris test method “Personal self-portrait” for the identification of lyceum students with signs of giftedness (part 2)]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of a gifted personality. 4 (87). 102–108. [in Ukrainian].
4. Bielska, N. A., Melnyk, M. Yu., & Novohorodska, M. M. (2020). Diahnostyka samovyznachennia shchodo maibutnoi profesii obdarovanykh uchniv litseiu [Diagnostics of self determination regarding the future profession of gifted lyceum students]. Kyiv. 36 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Novohorodska, M. M., & Laskova-Yarmolenko, A. O. (2022). Analitychnyi ohliad pidkhodiv do identyfikatsii akademichno obdarovanykh uchniv [Analytical review of approaches to the identification of academically gifted students]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of a gifted personality. 4 (87). 112–117. [in Ukrainian].
6. Tymenko V. P., & Brovchenko, A. I. (2022). Rozvytok proiektno-tvorchoi obdarovanosti yestva u systemi ukrainskoi dyzain-osvity [Development of project-creative giftedness in the system of Ukrainian design education]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of a gifted personality. 2 (85). 13–22. [in Ukrainian].
7. Fromm E. (2014). Maty chy buty? [To have or to be?]. Kyiv. 222 p. [in Ukrainian].
