Results of a pilot study of social parameters and individual intelligence indicators of students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63437/3083-6425-2025-4(99)-12

Keywords:

social thinking, emotional intelligence, stress management, value orientations, gifted students

Abstract

The article presents the results of a pilot empirical study of social parameters and individual indicators of intelligence of students in the context of modern social challenges. The sample consisted of students from general secondary, vocational pre-higher, and higher education institutions in Kyiv and other regions of Ukraine. A set of psychodiagnostic techniques was used: a test to determine stress levels (V. Shcherbatykh), a resource-oriented model of stress management BASIC Ph (M. Lakhad), a technique for diagnosing the real structure of value orientations (S. Bubnova), and a technique for studying emotional intelligence (N. Hall). It was shown that the majority of respondents have a high integral level of emotional intelligence, but partial scales revealed low scores for self-awareness, emotional self-regulation, self-motivation, and social influence. A significant prevalence of stressful states has been established: almost a third of the sample is in zones of severe and dangerous stress, combined with the dominance of cognitive coping strategies and insufficient use of emotional, social, creative, and physical resources. The structure of value orientations revealed the leading role of humanistic, leisure, and recognition values, as well as age differences between high school and university students.   The results of the pilot study became the basis for further expansion of the diagnostic complex, as it will allow moving from fragmentary assessment of individual psychological characteristics to multidimensional, systematic diagnosis of social thinking of gifted youth. The addition of social intelligence tests (adapted by O. Mikhailova, TSIS questionnaire), intelligence tests (R. Kettell, Raven's progressive matrices) and personality trait diagnostic tools (Leongard-Shmishchek, Big Five) will ensure comprehensive coverage of cognitive, motivational, emotional, characterological, and psychophysiological parameters of development. This approach will create a holistic view of the interrelationships between different levels of personality functioning, form a reliable empirical basis for further research into social parameters and individual indicators of intelligence, and open up the possibility of developing effective strategies for the development of social thinking in gifted students in the modern educational environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Використані літературні джерела

1. Вінник Н. Модель особистості інтелектуально обдарованого старшокласника. URL: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/24583/1/N_Vinnyk_PPtp_IL%20_2.pdf

2. Лучинкіна А. І. Розвиток інтелектуальної обдарованості засобами Інтернету : посібник. за заг. ред. Ю. М. Ковальчук. Київ : Інститут обдарованої дитини НАПН України, 2015. 70 с.

3. Матеюк О., Суходоля Ю. Соціальний інтелект: історія виникнення, динаміка точок зору на його сутність та зміст. Психологічні травелоги. 2023. № 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/PT-2023-1-12

4. Руденок А. І., Данчук Ю. П., Логвіна О. А. Особливості розвитку соціального інтелекту дітей молодшого шкільного віку в сучасних умовах цифрового середовища. Психологічні студії. 2023. № 4. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/psych.studies/2023.4.10

5. Савченко Ю. Ю. Розвиток емоційного інтелекту учнів молодшого шкільного віку. Освіта та розвиток обдарованої особистості. 2014. № 12. С. 12–16. URL: https://otr.iod.gov.ua/images/pdf/2014/12/5.pdf

6. Бреус Ю. В. Роль емоційного інтелекту в професійній діяльності керівника закладу середньої освіти : навчальний посібник. Київ : ДП «НВЦ «Пріоритети», 2016. 36 с.

7. Boyatzis R. E. Social Intelligence. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547174.ch251

8. Goleman D. Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. New York : Bantam Books, 2006.

9. Thorndike E. L. Intelligence and its Uses. Harper’s Magazine. 1920. Vol. 140. P. 227–235.

10. Lahad M., Shacham M., Ayalon O. The "BASIC Ph" Model of Coping and Resiliency: Theory, Research and Cross-Cultural Application. London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2012.

11. Kunkel M. A., Chapa B., Patterson G., Walling D. The Experience of Giftedness: A Concept Map. Gifted Child Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900302

References

1. Vinnyk, N. (n.d.). Model osobystosti intelektualno obdarovanoho starshoklasnyka [Model of the personality of an intellectually gifted high school student]. Retrieved from: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/24583/1/N_Vinnyk_PPtp_IL%20_2.pdf [in Ukrainian].

2. Luchynkina, A. I. (2015). Rozvytok intelektualnoi obdarovanosti zasobamy Internetu [Development of intellectual giftedness by means of the Internet]. Kyiv, 70 p. [in Ukrainian].

3. Mateiuk, O., & Sukhodolia, Yu. (2023). Sotsialnyi intelekt: istoriia vynyknennia, dynamika tochok zoru na yoho sutnist ta zmist [Social intelligence: History of origin and dynamics of views on its essence and content]. Psykholohichni travelohy – Psychological Travelogues, 1, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/PT-2023-1-12 [in Ukrainian].

4. Rudenok, A. I., Danchuk, Yu. P., & Lohvina, O. A. (2023). Osoblyvosti rozvytku sotsialnoho intelektu ditei molodshoho shkilnoho viku v suchasnykh umovakh tsyfrovoho seredovyshcha [Features of the development of social intelligence of primary school children in modern digital environment]. Psykholohichni studii – Psychological Studies, 4, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/psych.studies/2023.4.10 [in Ukrainian].

5. Savchenko, Yu. Yu. (2014). Rozvytok emotsiinoho intelektu uchniv molodshoho shkilnoho viku [Development of emotional intelligence of primary school students]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and Development of a Gifted Personality, 12, 12-16. Retrieved from: https://otr.iod.gov.ua/images/pdf/2014/12/5.pdf [in Ukrainian].

6. Breus, Yu. V. (2016). Rol emotsiinoho intelektu v profesiinii diialnosti kerivnyka zakladu serednoi osvity [The role of emotional intelligence in the professional activity of a secondary education institution head]. Kyiv, 36. [in Ukrainian].

7. Boyatzis, R. E. (2020). Social intelligence. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547174.ch251.

8. Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York, 403 p.

9. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227-235.

10. Lahad, M., Shacham, M., & Ayalon, O. (2012). The “BASIC Ph” model of coping and resiliency: Theory, research and cross-cultural application. London, 384 p.

11. Kunkel, M. A., Chapa, B., Patterson, G., & Walling, D. (1995). The experience of giftedness: A concept map. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39 (3), 126-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900302

Published

2025-12-26

Issue

Section

PEDAGOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE