Subjectivity as the Essence of Leadership: to the Problem of Development a Gifted Personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2022-4(87)-22-29Keywords:
gifted personality, leadership, leader, subjectivityAbstract
Solving the problems of modern societies, the devSolving the problems of modern societies, the development of which takes place at the expense of innovation, actualizes the task of pedagogical support of gifted children and youth. Among the multifaceted tasks of giftedness pedagogy is concern for the formation of leadership potential and leadership traits of a gifted personality.
Attention to the problems of leadership and education of leaders in the national scientifc space has noticeably increased in recent decades. The largest number of studies in this direction is devoted to management problems in higher education, as well as the formation of a professional leader in higher education. The smallest number of studies in the feld of pedagogical leadership problems related to the educational process in institutions of general secondary education.
In the opinion of the author of the article, the issue of subjectivity is tangential to the issue of leadership, which, due to political and mental reasons, developed precisely during the period of Ukraine's independence. Sociopolitical changes in Ukrainian society at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st centuries caused attention to the individual and its development in a democratic society. The analysis of the components of leadership qualities, summarized according to research on leadership theories, and their comparison with the generalized signs of individual subjectivity made it possible to draw promising conclusions regarding the proximity of the phenomena of leadership and subjectivity. The author concludes that the subjectivity of an individual is the basis and prerequisite of his leadership. Leadership is that integral characteristic of a person that combines his personal and social, and determines the interdependence of individual and social. The author notes the need to work out issues related to the formation of leadership qualities of gifted students of general secondary education institutions, as a component of pedagogical support for a gifted personality.
Downloads
References
1. Daft, R. L. (2006). Uroky lyderstva [Lessons of leadership]. Moscow, 480 p. [in Russian].
2. Kalashnikova, S. A. (2008). Lider v osviti [Leader in education]. Entsyklopediia osvity – Encyclopedia of education. Kyіv, P. 454. [in Ukrainian].
3. Sbruieva, A. A. (2008). Liderstvo [Leadership]. Entsyklopediia osvity – Encyclopedia of education. Kyіv, P. 454–455. [in Ukrainian].
4. Khmyzova, O. V. (2010). Fomuvannia liderskoi pozytsii u molodshykh shkoliariv u pozaurochnii diialnosti [Formation of a leadership position in junior high school students in extracurricular activities]: Abstract of the candidate’s thesis. Kyiv, 21 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Yahodnikova, V. V. (2006). Formuvannia liderskykh yakostei starshoklasnykiv v osobystisno oriientovanomu vykhovnomu protsesi zahalnoosvitnoi shkoly [Formation of leadership qualities of high school students in the personally oriented educational process of a comprehensive school]: Abstract of the candidate’s thesis. Luhansk, 21 p. [in Ukrainian].
6. Karpenko, Z. S. (2006). Kartohrfaiia intehralnoi subiektnosti: post-modernistskyi proiekt [Cartography of integral subjectivity: a post-modern project.]. Liudyna. Subiekt. Vchynok: Filosofsko-psykholohichni studii – Man. Subject. Action: Philosophical and psychological studies. Kyiv, P. 157–175. [in Ukrainian].
7. Karpenko, Z. (2018). Aksiolohchna psykholohiia osobystosti [Axiological personality psychology]. IvanoFrankivsk, 720 p. [in Ukrainian].
8. Hulias, I. A. (2010). Osobystist yak intehralnyi subiekt aksiopsykhiky [Personality as an integral subject of axiopsychics]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education. 2. P. 4–8. [in Ukrainian].
9. Tatenko, V. O. (1996). Psykholohyia v subъektnom yzmerenyy [Psychology in the subjective dimension]. Kyiv, 404 p. [in Ukrainian].
10. Tatenko, V. O. (2006). Subiektno-vchynkova paradyhma v suchasnii psykholohii [Subject- action paradigm in modern psychology]. Liudyna. Subiekt. Vchynok: Filosofsko- psykholohichni studii – Man. Subject. Action: Philosophical and psychological studies. Kyiv, P. 316–358. [in Ukrainian].
11. Brunova-Kalysetskaia, Y. V. (2009). Psykholohycheskaia samoэffektyvnost kak faktor krosskulturnoi adaptatsyy [Psychological self-efcacy as a factor of cross-cultural adaptation]: Сandidate’s thesis. Kyiv, 196 p. [in Ukrainian].
12. Hulias, I. A. (2019). Pryntsyp subiektnosti v aksiopsykholohichnomu proektuvanni zhyttievykh dosiahnen osobystosti [The principle of subjectivity in the axiopsychological design of life achievements of an individual]. Sotsialna psykholohiia sohodni: zdobutky i perspektyvy – Social psychology today: achievements and perspectives. P. 78–80. [in Ukrainian].
13. Pryshchak, M. D. (2019). Uchytysia buty vilnym: subiektnist osobystosti yak meta osvity [Learning to be free: the subjectivity of the individual as the goal of education]. Naukovi zapysky Vinnytskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Mykhaila Kotsiubynskoho – Scientifc notes of Mykhailo Kotsyubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University. Vol. 60. P. 38–44. [in Ukrainian].
14. Halian, O. I. (2017). Osobystist shkoliara u vymirakh subiektnosti: istoryko-pedahohichnyi dyskurs [Galyan Personality of the schoolboy in dimensions of subjectivity: historical and pedagogical discourse]. Drohobych, 360 p. [in Ukrainian].
15. Shekhavtsova, S. O. (2016). Subiektnist u pedahohichnomu aspekti: teoriia i praktyka [Subjectivity in the pedagogical aspect: theory and practice]. Poltava. 414 p. [in Ukrainian].
16. Shekhavtsova, S. O. (2017). Teoretychni i metodychni zasady formuvannia subiektnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv u protsesi fakhovoi pidhotovky [Theoretical and methodological principles of the formation of the subjectivity of future teachers in the process of professional training]: Doctor`s thesis. Starobilsk, 47 p. [in Russian].
17. Sazonova, O. (2018). Osoblyvosti pryiniattia rishen motyvovanykh na dosiahnennia uspikhu osib [Peculiarities of decision-making by people motivated to achieve success]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu – Bulletin of Lviv University. Vol. 2. P. 118–128. [in Ukrainian].
18. Hrebin, N. (2018). Psykholohichne manipuliuvannia u mizhosobystisnii vzaiemodii u rakursi subiektno-vchynkovoho pidkhodu [Psychological manipulation in interpersonal interaction from the perspective of the subject-action approach]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu – Visnyk of Lviv University. Vol. 2. P. 23–31. [in Ukrainian].
19. Rodzhers, K. (1994). Vzghliad na psykhoterapyiu. Stanovlenye cheloveka [Perspectives on psychotherapy. Becoming a human]. Moscow, 480 p. [in Russian].
20. Tereshchenko, L. A. (2019). Problema samorozvytku osobystosti za rozghliadom vitchyznianykh ta zarubizhnykh doslidnykiv [The problem of self-development of the personality according to the consideration of domestic and foreign researchers]. Sotsialna psykholohiia sohodni: zdobutky i perspektyvy – Social psychology today: achievements and prospects. Kyiv, P. 179–182. [in Ukrainian].
