Subjective action conceptual approach to understanding children’s subculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2309-3935-2023-1(88)-51-57Keywords:
children, action, subculture, object, subject, subjective action approachAbstract
The article highlights the conceptual understanding of children's subculture in the context of the action logic of human life in the light of the subjective action approach. It is noted that each psychological system can be thoroughly analysed and comprehensively evaluated as promising depending on the extent to which it bases itself on the action logic of human activity.
The following conceptual structural and logical schemes have been developed: 1) the relationship between subculture and action 2) the categorical space of the age subculture from the perspective of the subjective action approach. It is emphasised that the variability, dissimilarity, and originality of the content of children's subculture provides, on the one hand, an orientation to the lost, forgotten forms of human culture, and on the other hand, forecasting new ways of its development and the direction of psycho-socio-cultural development of society.
Over the past 50 years, it has been very high and there are no determinants to think that it will decrease. It affects everyone's life in one way or another. Therefore, the study of childhood becomes important, because today's children are the adults of the future, which will be completely different from what we thought. The world they will inherit will not be the world we know today. Therefore, if we want to work effectively for children, it is vital to understand those social processes and institutions that influence children and constitute the context of their lives.
The relevance of the study is also due to the lack of potential alternative variants of the morphological model of children's subculture. Its structure is multicomponent, the analysis of each element requires an interdisciplinary approach. Therefore, specialists from various humanitarian fields are involved in the research.
Downloads
References
1. Anishchenko, N. V. (2022). Vstupne slovo [Introductory word]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti – Education and development of a gifted personality]. 1 (84). P. 5. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bedrina, N. S. (2021). Transformatsiia komponentiv dytiachoi subkultury na Youtube-kanalakh [Transformation of components of children’s subculture on YouTube channels]. Pytannia kulturolohii – Questions of cultural studies. 37. P. 12–20. Retrieved from: http://issues-culture-knukim.pp.ua/article/view/235993.
3. Hrabovskyi, S. Dytiacha kultura: samotsinna skladova liudskoho zhyttia [Children’s culture: a valuable component of human life]. Retrieved from: https://glavcom.ua/columns/sgrabovskiy/dityacha- kultura-samocinna-skladova-lyudskogo-zhittya-391911.html.
4. Dytiacha subkultura v Ukraini: tradytsii ta suchasnist (kulturolohichnyi kontekst) [Children’s subculture in Ukraine: traditions and modernity (cultural context)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Kalba, Ya. Ye. (2010). Shkilnomu psykholohu: vchynkovyi potentsial starshoklasnyka [To the school psychologist: the action potential of a high school student]. Kyiv. 126 p. [in Ukrainian].
6. My znaiemo za shcho my voiuiemo. Zelenskyi rozpoviv pered yakym vyborom postavyla ukraintsiv viina i chomu rosiiu potribno izoliuvaty [We know what we are fighting for. Zelenskyi told what choice the war faced Ukrainians and why Russia needs to be isolated]. Retrieved from: https://war.obozrevatel.com/ukr/mi-znaemo-za-scho-mi-voyuemo-zelenskij-rozpoviv-pered-yakim- viborom- postavila- ukraintsiv- vijna- i- chomu-rosiyu-potribno-izolyuvati.htm.
7. Romenets, V. A. (2007). Istoriia psykholohii: ХIХ-pochatok ХХ stolittia [History of psychology: 19th-early 20th centuries: teaching. manual]. Kyiv. 829 p. [in Ukrainian].
8. Tatenko, V. O. (2006). Vid redaktora. Liudyna. Subiekt. Vchynok. Filosofsko-psykholohichi styudii [From the editor. Man. Subject. Act. Philosophical and psychological studies]. Kyiv. P. 6–10. [in Ukrainian].
9. Tatenko, V. (2017). Metodolohiia subiektno-vchynkovoho pidkhodu [Methodology of subject-action approach]. Kyiv. 184 p. [in Ukrainian].
10. Tatenko, V. O., Tytarenko T. M. Psykholohichna spadshchyna Volodymyra Romentsia [The psychological legacy of Volodymyr Romenets]. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/31102366/%D0%9F%.
11. Shulha, V. D. (2013). Spilnyi uchynok yak mekhanizm sotsializatsii uchnivskoi molodi [Joint action as a mechanism of socialization of student youth]. Thesis of candidate of psychology science. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
12. Shulha, V. D. (2014). Subiektno-vchynkovyi pidkhid do rozvytku sutnisnykh syl dytyny: metodolohiia pedahohiky i psykholohii XXI stolittia. [A subject-action approach to the development of a child’s essential powers: methodology of pedagogy and psychology of the 21st century]. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology. Retrieved from: www.seanewdim.com.
13. Clark, Rory McDowall (2010). Childhood in society for early childhood studies. Exeter.
14. Cole, M.; Martin, L.W., Nelson, K. & Toback, E. (Eds.) (1995). Cultural-historical psychology: A meso-genetic approach. Cultural psychology and activity theory: Essays in honor of Sylvia Scribner. Reprinted in Akmeologia: A Scientific Practical Journal, 2, Р. 104–129.
15. Fromm, E. (1998). Dusha cheloveka. Yeye sposobnost’ k dobru i zlu [The Soul of Man. Her ability for good and evil]. Moscow : AST-LTD, р. 256.
16. Jung, C. G. (1916). Über Konflikte der kindlichen Seele (in German) (Second ed.). Wien.
